The Investor's Shelf — one book
Flash Crash

Flash Crash

Liam Vaughan
2020
T2 272 pages · about 4h 32m to read OL20733027Wgoodreads

Navinder Sarao, spoofing and the 2010 crash.

Summary

Vaughan, a Bloomberg journalist, wrote about Navinder Sarao, the trader who operated alone from his parents' house in west London and who was arrested in 2015 and charged in connection with the May 2010 flash crash.

The factual narrative covers Sarao's career: learning to trade at an arcade, developing an unusual ability to read the order book in the stock index futures market, moving to trading from home, earning tens of millions of pounds, and using custom software to place and cancel large orders. The charge was spoofing, meaning placing orders with no intention of executing them in order to create a false impression of supply or demand and to move the price, then trading against the movement created.

The analytical question the book addresses is whether Sarao caused the flash crash, in which American equity indices fell around nine per cent and recovered within minutes. Vaughan is careful here. Sarao's orders were active that day and the Justice Department charged him in connection with it, but most market structure analysts and the official reports attribute the crash to the interaction of a large automated sell order with high-frequency market makers withdrawing liquidity, in a fragmented market structure where no participant was obliged to make prices. Vaughan presents both the charge and the technical scepticism about it.

The secondary narrative concerns what happened to Sarao's money: he was persuaded into investments and structures that lost nearly all of it, and he cooperated with prosecutors and received no custodial sentence.

The book is well reported and the market structure explanation is accurate. Vaughan avoids claiming more than the evidence supports about causation, which distinguishes it from the coverage at the time of the arrest.

Key takeaways 7

  1. Spoofing means placing large orders with no intention of executing them in order to move the price and then trading against the move.
  2. An individual trading from home with custom software could place orders large enough to affect a major futures market.
  3. Most market structure analysis attributes the flash crash to a large automated sell order interacting with market makers withdrawing liquidity.
  4. No participant in the fragmented American equity market structure was obliged to make prices, which is why liquidity could disappear entirely.
  5. The prosecution charged one individual in connection with an event that official reports attributed to structural interactions.
  6. Displayed orders can be cancelled faster than slower participants can act on them, which makes displayed liquidity unreliable.
  7. Recovering within minutes did not make the crash harmless, because trades executed at extreme prices were only partially cancelled.

Who should read it

Investors and market structure practitioners who want the flash crash explained accurately alongside the prosecution that followed it.

Where it sits in the reference 2

Assets
Business models

Similar books 6

Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.

Algorithmic Trading and DMA
Algorithmic Trading and DMABarry Johnson
Dark Pools
Dark PoolsScott Patterson
Flash Boys
Flash BoysMichael Lewis
Inside the Black Box
Inside the Black BoxRishi K. Narang
Market Microstructure Theory
Market Microstructure TheoryMaureen O'Hara
The Problem of HFT
The Problem of HFTHaim Bodek