The Investor's Shelf — one book
How to Measure Anything

How to Measure Anything

Douglas W. Hubbard
2007
T3 312 pages · about 5h 12m to read OL8206219Wgoodreads

Calibration and the value of information applied to intangibles.

Summary

Hubbard argues that anything a manager cares about can be measured, and that the objection that something is immeasurable rests on three confusions: about what measurement is, about what the object of measurement is, and about the methods available. He defines measurement as a reduction in uncertainty based on observation, expressed as a probability distribution rather than as a point estimate.

The method has several parts. First, define the decision the measurement is meant to inform, since a measurement that cannot change a decision has no value. Second, express current uncertainty as a calibrated probability interval, and Hubbard supplies calibration training exercises showing that most people are badly overconfident and that calibration is a learnable skill. Third, compute the expected value of information for each variable, which usually shows that the variables people want to measure have low information value and that a few overlooked ones dominate. Fourth, measure only those, using the cheapest method that reduces uncertainty, including small samples, decomposition, controlled experiments and Fermi estimation. He is emphatic that small samples carry far more information than people assume, and gives the rule of five, that the median of any population lies between the smallest and largest of five random samples about ninety-four percent of the time.

Hubbard also attacks common alternatives, particularly weighted scoring models and risk matrices, arguing they add noise rather than information. The book is practical and the calibration and expected-value-of-information material is directly usable. Its weakness is that Hubbard's own consulting method is presented as more settled than the evidence supports, and some case results are asserted rather than documented.

Key takeaways 7

  1. Measurement is a reduction in uncertainty from observation, not the achievement of an exact value, which means partial information counts as measurement.
  2. A measurement is worth making only if it can change a decision, so the decision must be specified before the metric is chosen.
  3. Most managers are badly overconfident in their estimates, and calibration to accurate ninety percent intervals is a trainable skill that takes a few hours.
  4. Computing the expected value of information usually shows that the variables people most want to measure carry little value and that a few ignored ones dominate.
  5. Very small samples reduce uncertainty far more than intuition suggests, and five random observations bracket the population median about ninety-four percent of the time.
  6. Weighted scoring models and coloured risk matrices add noise rather than information and perform worse than simple quantitative estimates.
  7. Any quantity, including reputation, quality or management effectiveness, can be decomposed into observable consequences that are measurable.

Who should read it

Operators and investors who need to quantify supposedly unmeasurable variables before a decision, and who want a working method for calibrated estimation.

Where it sits in the reference 2

Philosophy
Mental models

Who recommended it 2

Julia Galefreported
Book recommendations listed on their Good Books profile · aggregator only
Nick Ganjureported
Book recommendations listed on their Good Books profile · aggregator only

Similar books 6

Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.

The Signal and the Noise
The Signal and the NoiseNate Silver
Superforecasting
SuperforecastingPhilip E. Tetlock, Dan Gardner
Expert Political Judgment
Expert Political JudgmentPhilip E. Tetlock
Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Ri
Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of RiskPeter L. Bernstein
Algorithms to Live By
Algorithms to Live ByBrian Christian
Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction
Clinical Versus Statistical PredictionPaul E. Meehl