The Investor's Shelf — one book
Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking

Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking

Daniel C. Dennett
2013
T4 504 pages · about 8h 24m to read OL16816583Wgoodreads

Dennett's toolkit of thought experiments for reasoning carefully

Summary

Dennett assembles the thinking tools he has used across a career in philosophy of mind, defining an intuition pump as a thought experiment designed to make an intuition available for examination, and noting that they can be used honestly or to smuggle in conclusions.

The general tools include making mistakes deliberately and studying them; Rapoport's rules for criticism, which require restating your opponent's position so well that they would adopt your version, listing what you have learned from them, and only then criticising; the identification of what he calls a deepity, meaning a statement that is trivially true on one reading and profound but false on another; occam's broom, meaning the concealment of inconvenient facts; and the surgical use of the phrase surely as a marker for where an author knows their argument is weak.

The substantive tools address meaning, evolution, consciousness and free will, which are the areas Dennett worked in. He covers the intentional stance, meaning the practice of predicting a system's behaviour by treating it as having beliefs and desires; the argument that Darwinian processes produce design without a designer; his critique of the Chinese Room, of qualia and of zombie arguments; and his compatibilist position on free will.

The book works as both an introduction to Dennett's positions and as a set of general tools, and he is explicit about which is which. His positions on consciousness are minority views among philosophers and he presents them as settled more than the state of the debate warrants. The general tools, particularly Rapoport's rules and the deepity concept, are usable immediately and independent of the philosophy.

Key takeaways 8

  1. An intuition pump is a thought experiment that makes an intuition available for examination, and it can be used honestly or to smuggle in a conclusion.
  2. Criticism should begin by restating the opponent's position so well that they would adopt your version, then listing what you learned from them.
  3. A deepity is a statement that is trivially true on one reading and profound but false on another, and its apparent depth comes from the ambiguity.
  4. The word surely in an argument marks the point where the author knows the claim is weakest.
  5. Making mistakes deliberately and studying them produces understanding that avoiding mistakes does not.
  6. A system's behaviour can be predicted by treating it as having beliefs and desires, which is a stance rather than a claim about what it contains.
  7. Darwinian processes produce design without any designer, which removes the inference from apparent design to a designer.
  8. Dennett's positions on consciousness are minority views among philosophers and are presented as more settled than the debate warrants.

Who should read it

Anyone who argues professionally and wants general reasoning tools, particularly the rules for criticism, separable from the philosophy of mind.

Where it sits in the reference 3

Philosophy
Mental models
Mental models

Who recommended it 2 · 2 direct

Bookshelf — patrickcollison.com
The Sixteen Best Books I Read in 2016

Similar books 6

Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.

The Great Mental Models
The Great Mental ModelsShane Parrish, Rhiannon Beaubien
The Black Swan
The Black SwanNassim Nicholas Taleb
This Will Make You Smarter
This Will Make You SmarterJohn Brockman
Investing: The Last Liberal Art
Investing: The Last Liberal ArtRobert G. Hagstrom
Latticework: The New Investing
Latticework: The New InvestingRobert G. Hagstrom
The Model Thinker
The Model ThinkerScott E. Page