Why materials and structures hold; engineering reasoning made intuitive
Gordon, a materials scientist who worked on aircraft structures, explains why physical structures hold together and why they fail, covering tension, compression, bending, shear, elasticity, stress concentration and fracture, without requiring mathematics beyond arithmetic.
The central concepts are worth knowing outside engineering. Stress is force per unit area and strain is the resulting deformation, and the distinction between them explains most structural intuitions that are wrong. Materials store energy when deformed, and a structure fails when the stored energy released by a crack advancing exceeds the energy required to create the new surface, which is why brittle materials fail catastrophically and tough ones do not. Stress concentrates enormously at holes, notches and sharp corners, which is why the Comet airliners failed at their square windows and why almost every fatigue failure begins at a discontinuity. Safety comes from toughness, meaning the ability to absorb energy before breaking, rather than from strength.
Gordon covers the history alongside the physics: Gothic cathedrals, masonry arches, sailing ship rigging, iron bridges, boilers, aircraft and biological structures including bone, wood and tendon, which he treats as engineering solutions.
The book is genuinely entertaining, written with dry humour and directed at readers with no technical background. It is a classic of science writing. Its transferable content for non-engineers is the distinction between strength and toughness, and the principle that failures begin at discontinuities rather than at the point of highest load.
Readers wanting the physical principles of structural failure, with the strength-versus-toughness distinction transferable to reasoning about resilience generally.
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.