Cunningham organised a symposium in 1996 at which Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger and a group of academics, lawyers and investors discussed corporate governance, investing and the ideas in Buffett's shareholder letters. This volume is the annotated transcript, published for the twentieth anniversary.
The discussion covers the topics the Essays organise: what a corporation owes its shareholders and how that differs from what boards actually do; whether shares should be treated as ownership of a business or as instruments to be traded; accounting questions including option expensing, goodwill and pension assumptions; the case against diversification for informed investors; the role of the board and what independence means in practice; and market efficiency, on which Buffett and Munger argue against the academic position with the participants who hold it in the room.
The format's value is that Buffett and Munger are being questioned by people who disagree with them, which is unusual. Most Buffett material is written or spoken to sympathetic audiences.
The reference has not verified this volume's specific contents. It is a niche publication for readers already familiar with the Essays, and Cunningham's annotations connect the 1996 discussion to what followed. Readers new to the material should read The Essays of Warren Buffett first, which organises the letters by topic and is the substantive work this symposium discusses.
Readers already familiar with the Buffett Essays who want the symposium discussion, with the Essays themselves as the starting point.
Corporate-governance scholar and longtime George Washington University law professor; edits The Essays of Warren Buffett and writes on Berkshire and quality investing.
The Essays of Warren Buffett reorganises decades of Berkshire shareholder letters by subject - governance, accounting, mergers, valuation - turning scattered annual commentary into a usable manual. The later books extend the analysis to Berkshire's decentralised structure and to the traits that make a business durable enough to hold for decades.
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.


