The Investor's Shelf — one book
The Overstory

The Overstory

Richard Powers
2018
531 pages · about 8h 51m to read OL19074847Wgoodreads

Summary

Powers' 2018 novel, which won the Pulitzer Prize, follows nine characters whose lives connect to trees, structured in four sections named Roots, Trunk, Crown and Seeds. The first section gives each character a self-contained origin story, and the later sections bring several of them together in forest activism in the Pacific Northwest.

The scientific material concerns forest ecology, particularly research showing that trees communicate through fungal networks and chemical signalling, share resources across species, and function as connected systems rather than as competing individuals. The character Patricia Westerford, whose research is rejected and later vindicated, is based loosely on Suzanne Simard and on Diana Beresford-Kroodsby.

The argument the novel makes is about timescale. Powers structures the book so that human concerns are set against processes operating over centuries, and his implicit claim is that the inability to perceive slow change is what permits its destruction. The activism sections cover the tactics used in old-growth forest campaigns and their failure. One character, a programmer building a world simulation game, connects the ecological argument to technology and to the question of whether a system can be modelled well enough to be understood.

The novel is long and the structure means that several characters receive substantial development and then little resolution. Critics have objected that the human characters function as vehicles for the argument. The science is presented accurately in outline, though some of the popular claims about tree communication have been contested by other researchers since. Its interest for a general reader is the treatment of slow processes and the inability of institutions to act on them.

Key takeaways 8

  1. Trees communicate through fungal networks and share resources across species, which makes a forest a connected system rather than a collection of competitors.
  2. Human institutions cannot act on processes that operate over centuries, because the perception and the decision cycles are far shorter.
  3. Research that contradicts an established consensus is rejected first and vindicated later, which the Westerford character's arc demonstrates.
  4. Old-growth forests that took centuries to develop are removed in a period short enough that nobody observes the change.
  5. Activism directed at slow destruction fails because the opposing interests operate on the timescale institutions recognise.
  6. A system complex enough to be worth understanding may not be modellable, which the programmer character's simulation raises without resolving.
  7. The novel sets human lifespans against biological processes deliberately, which is its structural argument rather than a theme within it.
  8. Some popular claims about tree communication have been contested by researchers since publication.

Who should read it

Readers who want a novel arguing about timescale and the institutional inability to act on slow change, prepared for a long and structurally unusual book.

Where it sits in the reference 0

No entry holds this book yet. It reached the reference because someone recommended it.

Who recommended it 5 · 3 direct

Bookshelf
All book reviews — Gates Notes
The Best Books and Articles I Read in 2019 — tim.blog
Book recommendations listed on their Good Books profile · aggregator only
Book recommendations listed on their Good Books profile · aggregator only

Similar books 6

Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.

A Gentleman in Moscow
A Gentleman in MoscowAmor Towles
Dune
DuneFrank Herbert
The Alchemist
The AlchemistPaulo Coelho
The Catcher in the Rye
The Catcher in the RyeJ.D. Salinger
The Great Gatsby
The Great GatsbyF. Scott Fitzgerald
The Hunger Games
The Hunger GamesSuzanne Collins