This is the full-title edition of Catmull's account of building and running Pixar, and later Disney Animation, with a focus on the management problem of sustaining creative work after success. The central argument is that every Pixar film began badly and that the organisation's actual capability is the speed with which it identifies and fixes the problems. The mechanism is the Braintrust, a group of directors and story people who watch works in progress and give direct assessments with no authority to require changes, so the director retains ownership of the solutions. Catmull contrasts this with studio notes delivered by executives with power, which produce compliance rather than improvement.
His other practices include postmortems structured against the tendency to report only successes, giving anyone the authority to stop production when they see a defect, deliberately protecting new ideas while they are still fragile, and the argument that a good team fixes a weak idea while a weak team ruins a good one.
He covers the history including the Lucasfilm computer division, the relationship with Jobs, the Disney partnership and the 2006 acquisition, and the rebuilding of Toy Story 2 in nine months. His analysis of the hidden forces preventing candour includes the observation that the absence of reported problems is evidence of concealment rather than of health, and that managers must actively work to surface what people are hiding.
The book is favourable to its author and the failures described are mostly ones that were fixed. Pixar's later record and the departure of John Lasseter after misconduct allegations sit awkwardly with the culture described. The separation of feedback from authority is the transferable mechanism.
Leaders of creative and product organisations who need a working mechanism for candid feedback that does not collapse into hierarchy.
Co-founder and former president of Pixar and of Walt Disney Animation Studios; earlier a computer graphics researcher.
Creativity, Inc. sets out the specific mechanisms Pixar used to hold quality across twenty consecutive films - the Braintrust review with no authority over the director, daily work-in-progress screenings, and structured postmortems - which makes it a manual for managing work whose output cannot be specified in advance. The account of the Disney Animation turnaround shows the same practices applied to an organisation that was already failing.
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.




