The Investor's Shelf — one book
Doing Capitalism in the Innovation Economy

Doing Capitalism in the Innovation Economy

William H. Janeway
2012
T2 345 pages · about 5h 45m to read OL16664517Wgoodreads

A venture veteran on the state, bubbles and how innovation gets funded

Summary

Janeway spent decades as a venture capitalist at Warburg Pincus and holds a Cambridge doctorate in economics, and this book combines the two. His argument is that the innovation economy runs on what he calls the three-player game between the state, the capital markets and market competition, and that speculative bubbles and government funding have both been necessary to the deployment of every general purpose technology.

His historical claim is that transformational infrastructure, including canals, railways, electrification and the internet, was financed by speculative capital that destroyed itself in the process. Investors lost their money and society kept the infrastructure. He calls this productive waste and argues that no rational allocation process would have funded these projects at the required scale. Separately, the state funded the upstream science and served as the initial customer for computing, semiconductors and networking, which private capital would not have done.

His practical material comes from investing. He distinguishes between building a company with cash flow that funds itself and building one dependent on continued access to capital, and argues the second requires the investor to manage the funding market rather than the business. His concept of cash and control, meaning that a venture investor should hold enough of both to survive being wrong, is the operating principle he draws from his own record.

The book moves between memoir, economic history and Keynesian and Minskyan theory, and the transitions are not always smooth. Readers wanting a practical venture manual will find the theory demanding, and readers wanting the economics will find the memoir intrusive.

Key takeaways 7

  1. Transformational infrastructure has been financed by speculative bubbles whose investors lost their capital while society retained the assets.
  2. The state funded the upstream science and acted as the first customer for computing and networking, which private capital would not have done at that stage.
  3. The innovation economy requires all three of state funding, speculative capital and market competition, and removing any one stops the process.
  4. A venture investor must hold sufficient cash and sufficient control to survive being wrong, because the probability of being wrong is high and unmanageable.
  5. Companies dependent on continued access to capital require the investor to manage the funding market as the primary risk, not the business.
  6. Financial speculation is economically productive only when it funds durable assets, which is why the technology bubbles left more behind than the credit bubbles did.
  7. The efficiency of capital allocation is the wrong criterion for judging innovation finance, since the returns to the funder and the returns to society diverge systematically.

Who should read it

Venture investors and founders who want the economic history of how innovation is actually financed alongside a practitioner's operating principles.

Where it sits in the reference 3

Assets
Business models
Philosophy

Who recommended it 1 · 1 direct

Dwarkesh Podcast — Marc Andreessen (transcript)
“He wrote this book, which I really recommend, it's called Doing Capitalism”

Similar books 6

Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.

Recapturing the Spirit of Enterprise
Recapturing the Spirit of EnterpriseGeorge Gilder
Boulevard of Broken Dreams
Boulevard of Broken DreamsJosh Lerner
Angel
AngelJason Calacanis
Banker to the Poor
Banker to the PoorMuhammad Yunus
Big Debt Crises
Big Debt CrisesRay Dalio
Breakout Nations
Breakout NationsRuchir Sharma