Harari argues that having largely contained famine, plague and war as existential threats, humanity will next pursue immortality, engineered happiness and enhanced capability, which he groups as the pursuit of divinity. The book is a projection rather than a history, though it opens with a long historical section.
The central argument concerns humanism and its likely replacement. Harari holds that humanism, meaning the doctrine that individual human feeling and choice is the source of authority and meaning, replaced theistic religion and now underwrites democracy, markets and human rights. He argues that developments in life sciences undermine humanism's premises by showing that organisms are algorithms, that there is no unified inner self, and that choices can be predicted and manipulated by external systems better than by introspection.
He then projects two successors. Techno-humanism seeks to upgrade humans while preserving the human framework. Dataism treats information flow as the supreme value and evaluates humans by their contribution to data processing, in which case algorithms that know a person better than they know themselves will make their decisions, and human authority dissolves without any confrontation.
His analysis of the decoupling of intelligence from consciousness is the sharpest part, since it implies that systems can outperform humans at economically valuable tasks without any of the properties humanists treat as the source of human value. The book is speculative and Harari acknowledges this. Specialists dispute the historical compression and the confident claims about neuroscience. The argument that organisms are algorithms is a philosophical position stated as a finding. Read it for the framework about intelligence, consciousness and authority, not as prediction.
Investors and founders in artificial intelligence and biotechnology who want an argument about where authority moves when systems outperform human judgment.
No entry holds this book yet. It reached the reference because someone recommended it.
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.
