Princeton University Press. Open Library API unreachable this pass.
Andrew Lo and Stephen Foerster profile ten people who shaped modern portfolio theory and its practical application, drawing on original interviews with each: Harry Markowitz, William Sharpe, Eugene Fama, John Bogle, Myron Scholes, Robert Merton, Martin Leibowitz, Robert Shiller, Charles Ellis and Jeremy Siegel. Each chapter gives the intellectual biography, explains the contribution in accessible terms, and then asks the subject directly what portfolio they would actually recommend.
The structure produces a useful tension. The theoretical chapters establish mean-variance optimisation, the capital asset pricing model, efficient markets, option pricing and the equity risk premium. The interviews then show the authors of those ideas qualifying them heavily when asked about real portfolios. Markowitz describes not using his own optimiser for his personal account. Fama and Shiller disagree about whether prices contain excess volatility, and both appear here making their case. The final chapter collects the recommendations, and the convergence toward low-cost diversified index exposure across most of the group is the book's practical conclusion.
The treatment is respectful and does not press hard on the failures, particularly Long-Term Capital Management, where Merton and Scholes were principals. The historical narrative also concentrates on a single American academic lineage and gives little space to practitioners who built portfolio methods outside it. As an introduction to where the standard toolkit came from, and to how much confidence its creators place in it, the book is unusually well sourced.
Investors who want the intellectual history of index investing and portfolio theory told through the people who built it, with their own current views attached.
Charles E. and Susan T. Harris Professor, MIT Sloan School of Management; Director, MIT Laboratory for Financial Engineering; founder of AlphaSimplex Group
The Econometrics of Financial Markets and the variance-ratio work with MacKinlay are primary sources the field builds on, and the Adaptive Markets Hypothesis is a named framework in its own right.
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.



