The Investor's Shelf — one book
The Idea Factory

The Idea Factory

Jon Gertner
2012
T2 1 pages · about 1m to read OL16184356Wgoodreads

Bell Labs, and what a regulated network monopoly could afford to fund.

Summary

Gertner writes the history of Bell Labs, which produced the transistor, the laser, information theory, the solar cell, the communications satellite, the Unix operating system and the C programming language, among a great deal else, and asks what conditions produced that output.

The institutional conditions he identifies include funding from a regulated monopoly, which insulated research from quarterly returns and gave researchers decades rather than years; the physical arrangement of the Murray Hill building, with long corridors that forced people from different disciplines to encounter each other; the deliberate mixing of theoretical physicists, experimentalists, chemists, metallurgists and engineers on the same problems; the freedom given to researchers to pursue their own directions combined with a requirement that the work connect eventually to communications; and management by people who had done the research themselves, particularly Mervin Kelly.

The biographical material covers Kelly, Shockley, Bardeen, Brattain, Claude Shannon, John Pierce and William Baker, and Gertner is candid about Shockley's conduct and about the disputes over credit. His analytical conclusion is that the conditions were specific to a regulated monopoly with a guaranteed revenue base and an obligation to serve, and that they cannot be reproduced by a company facing competitive pressure. The antitrust consent decree that required Bell to license its patents freely also meant the transistor was made available to the whole industry.

Gertner is a journalist and the technical explanations are at a general level. The book is admiring and does not seriously examine what the monopoly cost consumers during the period. The institutional analysis is the reason to read it.

Key takeaways 8

  1. Bell Labs was funded by a regulated monopoly, which insulated research from quarterly returns and allowed timescales of decades.
  2. Theoretical physicists, experimentalists, chemists, metallurgists and engineers were deliberately assigned to the same problems and the same corridors.
  3. The physical arrangement of the building forced encounters between people from different disciplines, which was a design decision rather than an accident.
  4. Researchers chose their own directions within a requirement that the work connect eventually to communications, which provided direction without specifying the path.
  5. Management by people who had done the research themselves allowed judgments about which unpromising work to continue funding.
  6. The antitrust consent decree required Bell to license its patents freely, which is why the transistor became available to the whole industry.
  7. The conditions depended on a guaranteed revenue base and cannot be reproduced by a company under competitive pressure.
  8. Gertner does not seriously examine what the monopoly cost telephone customers during the period the research was funded.

Who should read it

Executives and investors thinking about how to fund long-horizon research, and readers wanting the conditions that produced the most productive laboratory in industrial history.

Where it sits in the reference 2

Business models
Industries

Who recommended it 3

A Year of Books, 2015
Book recommendations listed on their Good Books profile · aggregator only
Ron Conwayreported
Book recommendations listed on their Good Books profile · aggregator only

Similar books 6

Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.

The Master Switch
The Master SwitchTim Wu
Broadbandits
BroadbanditsOm Malik
Optical Illusions
Optical IllusionsLisa Endlich
Information Rules
Information RulesCarl Shapiro, Hal R. Varian
Networks of Power
Networks of PowerThomas P. Hughes
Telecosm
TelecosmGeorge Gilder