Lee's own strategic judgements, edited into a short reference.
Allison and Blackwill assembled Lee Kuan Yew's views on the major strategic questions from interviews they conducted with him and from his speeches, writings and previous interviews, organised by topic: the future of China, of the United States, of United States and China relations, of India, of Islamic extremism, of national economic growth, of geopolitics and globalisation, and of democracy. The book is short and consists largely of Lee's own words with brief editorial framing.
Lee's positions are stated flatly and are worth knowing because so many policymakers took them seriously. He held that China intends to be the greatest power in Asia and eventually the world and will not accept being a junior partner; that Chinese leaders will avoid confrontation until they are strong enough, working on a timescale of decades; that China's growth will slow because of demography, the difficulty of attracting talent given language and culture, and the constraints of a system that cannot allow free contest of ideas; that the United States retains decisive advantages in attracting global talent, in entrepreneurial culture and in the ability to renew itself; that India is held back by its caste structure, its bureaucracy and its federal constraints; and that democracy is not a precondition for development and can obstruct it at low income levels.
The format is a limitation. There is no argument or evidence, only assertion by an authoritative figure, and Allison and Blackwill do not challenge any of it. Lee's record includes both the transformation of Singapore and the suppression of political opposition, and readers should note that his views on governance are a defence of what he did. Several forecasts have been tested since 2013, particularly on Chinese assertiveness, where Lee was largely right on direction and wrong on timing.
Investors and executives with Asian exposure who want one influential strategist's stated positions on China, the United States and India, read as assertion rather than analysis.
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.



