The Investor's Shelf — one book
No One Would Listen: A True Financial Thrill

No One Would Listen: A True Financial Thriller

Harry Markopolos
2010
T2 368 pages · about 6h 8m to read OL18745950Wgoodreads

Insider-adjacent: the analyst who warned the SEC for nine years.

Summary

This is Harry Markopolos's account of his nine-year attempt to persuade the Securities and Exchange Commission that Bernard Madoff was running a fraud, published under a subtitle variant of the same work. The reference holds two entries for this title and the content described here is the same book.

Markopolos, an options analyst in Boston, was asked by his employer to reverse-engineer Madoff's returns and concluded within hours that the claimed split-strike conversion strategy could not generate them. He documents the analytical basis: the near-absence of correlation with equity markets, the options open interest that was too small to support the hedging the strategy required, the implausibly smooth return series, and the tiny audit firm. He describes submitting his analysis to the regulator repeatedly from 2000 onward and receiving no substantive response, and he describes the personal effect of holding the conclusion for nearly a decade.

The book is angry and self-dramatising in places, and Markopolos attributes the regulatory failure largely to incompetence rather than to institutional design. His testimony to Congress in February 2009 and this book contributed to reforms in how the Securities and Exchange Commission handles tips and to the creation of its whistleblower programme. As with the other entry for this work, readers wanting the fraud's full history should turn to Diana Henriques.

Key takeaways 7

  1. The claimed strategy's reported correlation with equity markets was too low to be consistent with holding equities at all.
  2. Required options positions exceeded the total open interest on the relevant exchange, which made the stated strategy arithmetically impossible.
  3. A quantitative analyst identified the fraud from marketing documents in hours, which shows the information was available to every investor.
  4. Regulators with legal rather than quantitative training could not evaluate the submission they received.
  5. Markopolos submitted the analysis five times over nine years without producing an examination that checked custody of assets.
  6. Feeder fund managers earning fees on the assets had no incentive to test the returns they were selling.
  7. Institutional investors delegated diligence to consultants who delegated it to the feeder funds, so nobody performed it.

Who should read it

Investors and compliance staff who want the analytical case against Madoff stated by the person who made it, noting this duplicates the other entry for the same book.

Where it sits in the reference 2

Companies
Assets

Similar books 6

Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.

Betrayal: The Life and Lies of Bernie Madoff
Betrayal: The Life and Lies of Bernie MadoffAndrew Kirtzman
Madoff Talks: Uncovering the Untold Story Be
Madoff Talks: Uncovering the Untold Story Behind the Most Notorious Ponzi Scheme in HistoryJim Campbell
Madoff: The Final Word
Madoff: The Final WordRichard Behar
Madoff with the Money
Madoff with the MoneyJerry Oppenheimer
The Wizard of Lies: Bernie Madoff and the De
The Wizard of Lies: Bernie Madoff and the Death of TrustDiana B. Henriques
Too Good to Be True: The Rise and Fall of Be
Too Good to Be True: The Rise and Fall of Bernie MadoffErin Arvedlund