
A former SEC lawyer on naked shorting and the fights around it.
Richard Sauer worked as an enforcement lawyer at the Securities and Exchange Commission for over a decade and then moved to a hedge fund that took short positions in companies it believed to be frauds. The book covers both halves of that career.
The regulatory material is the more useful. Sauer describes how enforcement cases were selected and resourced, the institutional preference for cases that could be won cleanly over cases that mattered, the effect of resource constraints on investigating complex financial fraud, and the way political and industry pressure operated on the agency. He describes specific investigations he worked on and what happened to them.
The short selling material covers his work at Kingsford Capital and the specific companies he researched, and it makes an argument about the function short sellers perform: they have a financial incentive to investigate fraud, which regulators and sell-side analysts do not, and they are consequently the first to identify many frauds. He covers the hostility short sellers face, including litigation, investigator harassment and regulatory scrutiny directed at them rather than at their targets, and the 2008 short selling bans. Sauer writes as an interested party defending a practice he profited from, and readers should weigh that. The account of the regulator's internal constraints is well informed and is the reason to read the book.
Investors interested in short selling as a research discipline and in how securities enforcement actually allocates its attention.
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.




