The Alchemists

Irwin, then a Washington Post economics reporter, wrote a history of the 2007 to 2012 period told through three central bankers: Ben Bernanke at the Federal Reserve, Mervyn King at the Bank of England, and Jean-Claude Trichet at the European Central Bank.

The historical framing sets up the modern institutions by tracing their origins, from the Swedish Riksbank and the Bank of England's founding through Bagehot's rule that a central bank should lend freely at a penalty rate against good collateral in a panic, and through the Federal Reserve's creation after 1907.

The crisis narrative covers the improvisation. Irwin documents the Federal Reserve's construction of lending facilities against unprecedented collateral, the decision not to rescue Lehman and the arguments about whether it could have, the swap lines to foreign central banks, and the move to quantitative easing. He shows King resisting bank recapitalisation and then designing the British scheme that others copied. He covers Trichet's institutional position: a central bank without a state behind it, prohibited from monetary financing, governed by a council of national representatives, raising rates in July 2008 and again in 2011 as inflation rose while the real risk was collapse.

His general argument is that central bankers held extraordinary discretionary power, that they used it with limited democratic authorisation, and that the crisis was managed by a small number of individuals making judgement calls without a framework.

The book is reported rather than analytical, and Irwin is broadly sympathetic to his subjects, having interviewed them extensively. It was published in 2013 and predates Draghi's later actions, the negative rate era, the taper and the inflation of the 2020s. Tooze's Crashed, also in this reference, covers overlapping ground with more analysis and less sympathy.