
Akerlof and Shiller argue that macroeconomics has excluded the psychological factors Keynes called animal spirits, and that a great deal of what economies actually do cannot be explained without them.
They identify five components. Confidence, which is not merely a rational forecast but a state that leads people to act without full information and which has multiplier effects through the economy. Fairness, which determines wage setting and explains why wages do not fall in recessions as market clearing would require. Corruption and bad faith, which appear in predictable cycles and which mainstream models treat as outside economics. Money illusion, meaning that people respond to nominal rather than real values, which the profession assumed away and which the evidence supports. And stories, meaning the narratives people hold about the economy, which spread and which change behaviour.
They then apply these to eight questions: why economies fall into depression, why central banks have the power they do, why some people cannot find work, why there is a trade-off between inflation and unemployment in the long run, why saving for the future is arbitrary, why financial prices and investment are so volatile, why real estate markets go through cycles, and why minority poverty persists.
The book was published in 2009 and its argument was well timed. Its weakness is that identifying omitted factors is easier than incorporating them, and the book proposes no formal framework that replaces what it criticises. The chapters vary in quality and the treatment of minority poverty has been criticised as thin.
Investors and policy readers who want the behavioural critique of macroeconomics stated by two of its most credible proponents.
Sterling Professor of Economics Emeritus, Yale University; co-creator of the Case-Shiller home price indices; Nobel laureate in economics 2013
Excess-volatility work and Irrational Exuberance are the primary sources for the empirical case that asset prices move far more than fundamentals justify.
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.


