
Shiller argues that popular stories spread through a population in a way that can be modelled epidemiologically, and that these narratives are a genuine cause of economic events rather than a description of them. He proposes that economists should study the spread of narratives with the same seriousness they apply to interest rates and money supply.
His method borrows from epidemiology directly: the Kermack-McKendrick model of contagion, with a contagion rate and a recovery rate, applied to the spread of an idea. He uses digitised text databases including Google Ngrams and newspaper archives to trace the frequency of specific phrases over time and to show that economic narratives rise and fall in patterns resembling epidemic curves.
He identifies nine perennial narratives that recur in different forms, including panic versus confidence, frugality versus conspicuous consumption, the gold standard versus bimetallism, labour-saving machines replacing jobs, real estate booms, stock market bubbles, boycotts and profiteers, and evil business and labour unions. He argues the 1920 to 1921 depression, the Depression, and the 2008 crisis each involved narrative contagion that the standard accounts omit.
The idea is important and Shiller's authority makes it worth taking seriously. The execution is the weak part. The evidence is largely word frequency counts, which establish that a phrase became common without establishing that it caused anything, and the epidemiological models are illustrative rather than fitted and tested. Shiller acknowledges this and presents the book as an agenda rather than a result, which is the right way to read it.
Investors interested in how stories move markets, read as a research agenda rather than as a demonstrated result.
Sterling Professor of Economics Emeritus, Yale University; co-creator of the Case-Shiller home price indices; Nobel laureate in economics 2013
Excess-volatility work and Irrational Exuberance are the primary sources for the empirical case that asset prices move far more than fundamentals justify.
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.



