Stross wrote this account of NeXT, the computer company Jobs founded after being forced out of Apple in 1985, covering the period through the early 1990s when the hardware business had failed.
The business material is a case study in a well-funded startup getting almost every decision wrong. NeXT built an expensive, technically sophisticated workstation for the higher education market, priced it beyond what universities would pay, built a fully automated factory in Fremont before there was demand to justify it, insisted on an optical drive that was too slow, refused to include a floppy drive, and shipped years late. Ross Perot invested twenty million dollars, Canon invested a hundred million, and the hardware business sold a small fraction of what any of the plans assumed before being abandoned in 1993.
Stross wrote before the ending. NeXTSTEP, the operating system that was the company's genuine achievement, was later acquired by Apple in 1996, became the foundation of Mac OS X and of iOS, and returned Jobs to Apple. The book therefore describes a failure whose asset turned out to be the most valuable thing Jobs built.
Stross had no cooperation from Jobs and the portrait is unsympathetic, treating the decisions as products of a founder whose confidence was not calibrated to his knowledge. Read as a study of how conviction and capital produce a well-executed wrong product, it is useful. Read as a judgement on Jobs it was made too early to stand.
Founders and investors studying how capital and conviction sustain a wrong product, in an account written before the outcome was known.
Business historian and journalist, longtime professor at San Jose State University; wrote reported histories of Edison, Microsoft, Google and Y Combinator.
Each book reports one organisation from inside over a defined stretch of time: a year among Y Combinator's batch companies, Benchmark's partners through the dot-com IPO wave, Edison's Menlo Park laboratory. The result records how venture firms and inventors actually spent their days, which reads as evidence rather than retrospective summary.
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.




