The Investor's Shelf — one book
The Rare Find: Spotting Exceptional Talent B

The Rare Find: Spotting Exceptional Talent Before Everyone Else

George Anders
2011
T4 OL15952135Wgoodreads

Summary

Anders, a journalist who covered venture capital and business for the Wall Street Journal, investigated how organisations that must find exceptional performers actually do it. He reports from Army Special Forces selection, Facebook's engineering recruitment, Teach for America, professional sports scouting, venture capital, orchestra auditions and surgical residencies.

The argument is that conventional hiring optimises for the absence of flaws, which selects for candidates who are broadly acceptable and rarely outstanding. Organisations that find exceptional people do the opposite. They first define which capabilities actually determine performance in the role, then accept serious weaknesses in every other area. Anders calls this the jagged resume, and he argues that the best candidates are frequently rejected by conventional screening because their record contains something disqualifying.

He identifies specific practices. Auditioning candidates on real work predicts better than interviews. Selection processes that create genuine stress reveal how people behave when tired and uncertain. Looking in places competitors ignore produces cheaper talent, which is why Special Forces recruits from unlikely backgrounds and why some venture investors back founders without pedigree. He also argues for taking the second look at candidates the process rejected, and for treating talent development as part of selection rather than as a later stage.

The evidence is reported case studies rather than data, and the selection of cases is not systematic. The book does not engage seriously with the industrial psychology literature on selection validity, which supports structured interviews and work samples and is more sceptical of the intuitive judgement some of his subjects rely on. Facebook's recruiting practices as described are also now dated.

Key takeaways 7

  1. Conventional hiring screens for the absence of weakness, which systematically excludes exceptional candidates.
  2. An organisation must define which two or three capabilities actually determine performance before it can hire well.
  3. Candidates with uneven records outperform candidates with uniformly acceptable ones in roles requiring exceptional output.
  4. Auditions on real work predict performance better than interviews about past work.
  5. Selection processes that induce fatigue and uncertainty reveal traits that comfortable interviews cannot.
  6. Recruiting from talent pools competitors ignore produces better candidates at lower cost.
  7. Rejected candidates deserve a second review, because the first screen encodes the organisation's blind spots.

Who should read it

Founders and hiring managers building teams where a few exceptional performers matter more than average quality across the group.

Where it sits in the reference 2

Business themes
Business themes

Who recommended it 1 · 1 direct

Chai with Pabrai bookshelf — Entrepreneurship, Management and Leadership

Similar books 6

Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.

Talent Is Overrated: What Really Separates W
Talent Is Overrated: What Really Separates World-Class Performers from Everybody ElseGeoffrey Colvin
Work Rules!
Work Rules!Laszlo Bock
Hire With Your Head: Using Performance-Based
Hire With Your Head: Using Performance-Based Hiring to Build Great Team
Talent Wins
Talent WinsRam Charan
The Alliance
The AllianceReid Hoffman, Ben Casnocha
The Good Jobs Strategy
The Good Jobs StrategyZeynep Ton