
Labor historian on Walmart as a new template for capitalism.
Nelson Lichtenstein is a labour historian, and he argues that Wal-Mart represents a new template for capitalist organisation in the way that the Pennsylvania Railroad, Ford and General Motors did in earlier periods, and that its practices have reshaped the American economy.
His historical argument places the company in the context of American retail development and of the shift of economic power from manufacturers to retailers. He documents how Wal-Mart's scale allowed it to dictate terms to suppliers, requiring price reductions annually and imposing its own logistics and data standards, and how this reversed the relationship in which manufacturers had previously set prices and controlled distribution. Procter and Gamble's accommodation to Wal-Mart is his central case.
The labour material covers the company's employment practices, its opposition to unionisation, its wage and scheduling policies, and the litigation over off-the-clock work and discrimination. Lichtenstein connects these to the broader decline in American labour standards, arguing that Wal-Mart's model set a benchmark that competitors had to match. He also covers the company's origins in the rural South and the cultural and political character that came with it, and the supply chain's relocation to China.
The book is written from a labour perspective and gives limited weight to the consumer benefit that the economic literature attributes to the company. It is more analytical and less journalistic than Bianco's Bully of Bentonville and situates the company in a longer history of American business organisation.
Investors and operators who want Wal-Mart analysed as a template for how economic power shifted from manufacturers to retailers.
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.




