No One Would Listen: A True Financial Thriller
Insider-adjacent: the analyst who warned the SEC for nine years.
Summary
This is Harry Markopolos's account of his nine-year attempt to persuade the Securities and Exchange Commission that Bernard Madoff was running a fraud, published under a subtitle variant of the same work. The reference holds two entries for this title and the content described here is the same book.
Markopolos, an options analyst in Boston, was asked by his employer to reverse-engineer Madoff's returns and concluded within hours that the claimed split-strike conversion strategy could not generate them. He documents the analytical basis: the near-absence of correlation with equity markets, the options open interest that was too small to support the hedging the strategy required, the implausibly smooth return series, and the tiny audit firm. He describes submitting his analysis to the regulator repeatedly from 2000 onward and receiving no substantive response, and he describes the personal effect of holding the conclusion for nearly a decade.
The book is angry and self-dramatising in places, and Markopolos attributes the regulatory failure largely to incompetence rather than to institutional design. His testimony to Congress in February 2009 and this book contributed to reforms in how the Securities and Exchange Commission handles tips and to the creation of its whistleblower programme. As with the other entry for this work, readers wanting the fraud's full history should turn to Diana Henriques.
Key takeaways 7
- The claimed strategy's reported correlation with equity markets was too low to be consistent with holding equities at all.
- Required options positions exceeded the total open interest on the relevant exchange, which made the stated strategy arithmetically impossible.
- A quantitative analyst identified the fraud from marketing documents in hours, which shows the information was available to every investor.
- Regulators with legal rather than quantitative training could not evaluate the submission they received.
- Markopolos submitted the analysis five times over nine years without producing an examination that checked custody of assets.
- Feeder fund managers earning fees on the assets had no incentive to test the returns they were selling.
- Institutional investors delegated diligence to consultants who delegated it to the feeder funds, so nobody performed it.
Who should read it
Investors and compliance staff who want the analytical case against Madoff stated by the person who made it, noting this duplicates the other entry for the same book.
Similar books 6
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.
Fast first draft, published months after the arrest.
Built on prison correspondence and interviews.
A portrait of Bernie Madoff the man, and how he ran his fraud.
How Bernie Madoff's fraud began, how it ran for decades, and how it collapsed.
By the reporter who publicly questioned the returns in 2001.
Where it sits in the reference 4
Topics