
How the modern consulting partnership was invented and priced.
McDonald traces McKinsey from James O. McKinsey's accounting practice through Marvin Bower's construction of the modern professional firm, the Ron Daniel and Fred Gluck years, the Rajat Gupta era, and the reputational damage from Enron, from Gupta's insider trading conviction, and from the firm's role in the 2008 period.
The institutional analysis is the useful part. McDonald explains how Bower built the model that every professional services firm copied: hire from top schools rather than from industry, promote or leave, sell to the chief executive, never advertise, maintain a single global profit pool, and insist that the client's interest overrides the engagement. He shows how the up-or-out system creates an alumni network that becomes the firm's most valuable sales asset, and how the one-firm profit pool prevents partners from hoarding clients. He also documents the shift from advising on organisation to advising on strategy, and the emergence of a competitive threat from Bain and BCG that pushed McKinsey toward measurable results.
The accountability question runs through the book. McDonald asks what McKinsey is actually responsible for, given that it advises without bearing consequences, and he covers the Enron relationship in detail, since Jeff Skilling was a McKinsey partner and the firm blessed the business model. His answer is somewhat inconclusive, and critics have said the book is too admiring given the material. Subsequent reporting, particularly on opioid work and on authoritarian government clients, is more damning than anything here and postdates the 2013 publication.
Operators who buy consulting services and anyone building a professional services firm who wants the origin of its standard operating model.
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.




