Losing the Signal
BlackBerry's rise and collapse, Canada's largest technology failure.
Summary
McNish and Silcoff, Canadian business journalists, reconstruct Research In Motion from Mike Lazaridis's engineering work through the BlackBerry's dominance and its collapse after the iPhone. They had access to Lazaridis and Jim Balsillie and to many former executives.
The technical origin is the most important part. BlackBerry was built for network efficiency, compressing data so that a message consumed a fraction of the bandwidth of a competing device, because carrier networks in the 1990s could not support anything heavier. That constraint produced the network operations centre architecture, the battery life, and the carrier relationships that made the company. When networks improved, the engineering advantage that defined the product became irrelevant, and the same architecture became a liability that made BlackBerry slow to support a full browser and third-party applications.
The organisational story is the co-chief-executive structure, which worked while the questions were engineering and sales and failed when the company needed a single strategic decision. McNish documents Lazaridis's technical objection to the iPhone, which was correct on its merits about network load and battery, and irrelevant because customers wanted the device anyway. She covers the patent litigation with NTP, the stock option backdating investigation, the Storm's failure and the PlayBook. For founders and investors the case is about a competitive advantage that was defined by a constraint, and about what happens when the constraint disappears. The book ends in 2015 and does not cover the software pivot.
Key takeaways 7
- BlackBerry's advantage came from extreme network efficiency, which was decisive while carrier bandwidth was scarce and worthless once it was not.
- Lazaridis's technical criticisms of the iPhone were accurate about battery and network load and irrelevant to what customers chose.
- The co-chief-executive structure functioned while the company faced separable engineering and commercial problems and failed when a single strategic choice was required.
- Carrier relationships that were BlackBerry's distribution advantage became a constraint, because carriers wanted devices that used more data rather than less.
- The company's architecture, built around a central network operations centre, could not be adapted quickly to a full browser and an application ecosystem.
- BlackBerry's enterprise security position was real but did not protect it, because employees brought consumer devices to work and employers accepted them.
- An incumbent defending a technically superior product loses when the basis of customer preference shifts to a dimension the incumbent has optimised away.
Who should read it
Founders and investors studying how a technical advantage tied to a temporary constraint disappears, and how governance structures fail under strategic pressure.
Who recommended it 2 · 2 direct
Similar books 6
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.
Insider account by the engineer who built the iPhone keyboard.
Recommended by: Chris Dixon, Jordan Hughes, Keith Rabois
Strategy comparison explaining how Samsung overtook Sony.
Simplicity as Apple's operating principle, from the adman who worked with Jobs.
Recommended by: Andrew Wilkinson, Austen Allred and 1 other
The first volume of a history of the Hudson's Bay Company.
Foxconn from the inside; the labour cost of the contract model.
Where it sits in the reference 2
Topics