Doughnut Economics
Summary
Raworth, an economist who worked at Oxfam and the United Nations, proposes replacing growth as the objective of economics with a target range bounded on the inside by a social foundation, meaning the minimum resources every person needs, and on the outside by an ecological ceiling, meaning the planetary boundaries beyond which environmental systems break down. The safe and just space between them is the doughnut.
She presents seven ways of thinking she argues economics must adopt. Change the goal from GDP growth to the doughnut. Draw the whole picture, meaning include the household, the commons and the state rather than only the market. Nurture human nature, replacing the rational self-interested agent with what behavioural and experimental evidence actually shows. Get savvy with systems, replacing equilibrium with dynamic complexity. Design to distribute, meaning build distribution into the structure of ownership and enterprise rather than redistributing afterward. Create to regenerate, meaning design circular material flows rather than linear extraction and disposal. And be agnostic about growth, meaning build economies that can function without requiring growth.
The critique of existing economics is largely fair and draws on established heterodox and behavioural work. The book's weakness is the constructive half: the doughnut is a set of indicators rather than a model, and it does not supply a mechanism for allocating resources, setting prices or making trade-offs between the boundaries. Growth-agnosticism is asserted rather than shown to be achievable given debt structures and employment. The framework has been adopted by several city governments.
Key takeaways 7
- Economic activity should be bounded by a social foundation below and an ecological ceiling above, rather than aimed at maximum growth.
- GDP measures throughput rather than welfare, and using it as the objective directs policy toward the wrong outcomes.
- Standard economics excludes the household, the commons and unpaid work, which removes a large share of the activity that sustains an economy.
- Behavioural and experimental evidence contradicts the rational self-interested agent, and models built on it therefore describe a species that does not exist.
- Distribution should be built into the ownership structure of enterprises rather than corrected afterward through transfers.
- Material flows should be designed as circular from the start, since retrofitting recycling onto linear extraction recovers only a fraction.
- Economies should be built to function without requiring growth, because indefinite material growth on a finite planet is not available.
Who should read it
Readers who want the strongest current statement of the case against growth as an economic objective, with the constructive half treated as incomplete.
Who recommended it 1
Similar books 6
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.
Evidence that rich economies now grow while using fewer physical resources.
“on how modern technological economies can build more outputs with less inputs” — Marc Andreessen
Source: @pmarca, companion thread to 'It's Time to Build'
Recommended by: Marc Andreessen
Resource productivity framed as an unpriced balance-sheet asset.
Recommended by: Joe Gebbia
Patagonia's founder on running a business against conventional growth logic
Recommended by: Nat Eliason, Patrick Collison, David Cancel and 3 others
The triple bottom line: report on economic, environmental and social results.
Design products on nature's model, where waste becomes food for the next cycle.
Recommended by: Joe Gebbia
Where it sits in the reference 2
Topics