Dollars and Sense
Ariely and Kreisler's book on money irrationality covers pain of paying, opportunity cost neglect, and the psychology of credit card spending. It extends Ariely's earlier research into financial contexts specifically, and the experiments here are among the most readable in the genre.
Summary
Ariely and Kreisler, a behavioural economist and a financial planner, applied behavioural findings to personal spending and money decisions.
The organising argument is that money is difficult to think about because it is fungible and abstract, so people substitute easier judgements. Their catalogue of the resulting errors includes relativity, meaning that people evaluate a price against a nearby reference rather than against alternative uses of the money; mental accounting, meaning that money is categorised and treated differently depending on its label despite being fungible; the pain of paying, which varies with the payment method and which credit cards and automatic payments reduce, increasing spending; anchoring on a first price encountered; the endowment effect on things already owned; overvaluing effort visible in a product, so that a locksmith who takes longer is paid more willingly than one who is faster; language and rituals around consumption, which change experienced value; expectations, which change actual enjoyment; self-control failures and present bias; and the tendency to overweight the free option.
The practical prescriptions follow: make the cost of spending visible rather than automatic, evaluate purchases against what else the money could do rather than against a reference price, use pre-commitment devices for saving, and separate the decision from the moment of temptation.
The book is written accessibly with illustrative narratives. Its underlying research comes from a literature that has had serious problems: Ariely's own work has been affected by the documented data fabrication in a paper he co-authored, and several priming and self-control findings in behavioural economics have replicated poorly. The core findings on mental accounting, relativity and payment friction have held up better. Readers should treat individual claims as provisional.
Key takeaways 7
- People evaluate a price against a nearby reference rather than against what else the money could buy.
- Money is fungible but is treated differently depending on its mental label, which produces inconsistent decisions.
- Payment methods that reduce the pain of paying, including cards and automatic payments, increase spending.
- Visible effort in a service increases willingness to pay, even when faster completion is a better outcome.
- Anchoring on the first price encountered shapes what subsequently seems reasonable regardless of value.
- The word free changes behaviour disproportionately relative to a very low price.
- Some of the research underlying this literature has replicated poorly, so individual claims should be treated as provisional.
Who should read it
Readers who want behavioural findings applied to personal spending, and pricing practitioners interested in how payment framing changes willingness to pay.
About Dan Ariely
Professor of psychology and behavioral economics at Duke University who runs experiments on how people misjudge value.
Predictably Irrational reports controlled experiments showing that valuation errors are systematic and repeatable: relative comparison, the pull of free, the effect of price on expected quality. The findings bear directly on pricing, bundling, incentive design and any forecast that assumes rational buyers.
Similar books 6
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.
Experiments showing that people depart from rational choice in repeatable ways.
Recommended by: Mohnish Pabrai, Alfred Lin, Anna Cheng and 6 others
Experiments showing most cheating is many people cheating a little.
Recommended by: Mohnish Pabrai
Edited volume.
Classifies investors into behavioural types for advice and design.
Applies behavioural finance to building portfolios for real clients.
Where it sits in the reference 2
Topics