
Who lives and who dies in extreme situations, and why
Gonzales examines why some people survive accidents and disasters that kill others in identical circumstances. He works from accident reports, survival case histories in mountaineering, aviation, sailing and wilderness, interviews with survivors, and research on stress physiology and cognition.
His explanation centres on mental models. People build an internal map of a situation and then act on the map rather than on the terrain, and under stress they continue acting on the map after it has stopped matching. He connects this to the physiology: the amygdala responds faster than the neocortex, high stress narrows attention and degrades working memory, and trained responses execute automatically whether or not they fit. The survivors in his cases are the ones who update the model quickly, who accept the new situation without wasting effort on how it should have been, who act on small immediate tasks rather than on the whole problem, and who keep a sense of humour and of purpose.
The practical output is a list of survivor behaviours: perceive and believe, stay calm, think and plan, take correct decisive action, celebrate small successes, count your blessings, play, see the beauty, believe you will succeed, surrender to the possibility of death, do whatever is necessary, and never give up. Gonzales writes as an essayist and the science is presented loosely, with the neuroscience simplified and some of the stress research now dated. The case histories are the strongest part, and the general lesson about updating a model under pressure transfers directly to decision-making outside physical danger.
Decision-makers who want a study of how mental models fail under stress, drawn from physical survival cases but applicable to any high-pressure judgement.
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.
Why people mistake luck for skill, above all in markets.
“Fooled by Randomness is a serious, intellectually sophisticated book, well worth reading carefully. At times, the book is condescending. Nevertheless, there are some great insights.” — Barton Biggs
Source: Biggs on a sophisticated book worth reading carefully
Recommended by: Barton Biggs, Michael Mauboussin and 11 others
Why people misjudge risk; the availability heuristic in public life
Recommended by: Morgan Housel
How people learned to measure risk, from early probability to portfolio theory.
“I think some of the books that are a must would be Peter Bernstein's book about risk, Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk.” — Charles de Vaulx
Source: De Vaulx naming Bernstein's book a must-read on risk
Recommended by: Charles de Vaulx, Jim Collins and 8 others
Second-level thinking, risk and market cycles, drawn from Oaktree's client memos.
Recommended by: Matt Mullenweg, Mohnish Pabrai, Nat Eliason and 3 others
Bevelin distilling observation and inference habits from Sherlock Holmes
Recommended by: Mohnish Pabrai, Patrick O'Shaughnessy and 1 other
A 20-year test of 28,000 expert forecasts: foxes with many models beat hedgehogs.
“All pundits and commentators should publish their prediction track records, yet don't. What to pay attention to and what to ignore.” — Marc Andreessen
Source: @pmarca, 'Thread: Books I've recently read and recommend'
Recommended by: Marc Andreessen, Michael Mauboussin and 2 others
Topics