Updates

  1. Person pages list letters, writing, profiles and links as sortable tables with filters, and show each person's companies as links; Fund letters show each letter's description in its own column.
  2. Experts show a checked job title and a short description of each person; 30 more people have photographs.
  3. Every company, fund, university and publication the experts work for has a page listing the people there.
  4. Fund letters show each letter's thesis and filter by it; 225 person pages list the essays, columns and newsletter issues the person wrote.
  5. Person pages list every essay and newsletter issue a person wrote, and their own books as a table in List view.
  6. Recommends shows the five largest kinds of book and the rest under More; browse pictures load sooner.
  7. Podcasts and talks link the original episode, filter by Audio and video or Press, and list each publisher once.
  8. Pages are wider, Recommends has List and Grid, and a filter clicked again turns off.
  9. Book cards sit in a ruled grid with Open Library and Goodreads links and each book's one-line note.
  10. Funds is now Investors; each investor's styles are buttons that filter the table.
  11. Podcasts and talks on a person's page filter by year and publisher and show as a list or a grid of pictures.
  12. Quotes show only people's own words: 472 summaries written by list sites are gone.
  13. Country pages open from Browse again, and every link on the shelf lands on a page.
  14. Subject and person pages show their sections as tabs, and each book appears once on a person's page.
  15. Book cards show the quote, who said it and the source; grids show five cards to a row.
  16. On a phone, a menu holds the sections, search, Updates, Feedback and dark mode.
  17. Feedback takes a screenshot of the page with no browser prompt, opens a screenshot full size when you click it, and clears itself once sent.
  18. Book cards are centred, search names the topic each book sits in, and any text cut short shows whole on hover.
  19. Search groups its results by kind: people, companies, geographies, subjects, topics, books, funds, fund letters and papers.
  20. The Books table lists who recommended each book by name, and the browser tab names the section you are in.
  21. Feedback can take a screenshot of the page, or one you paste or choose, and opens in the corner beside Updates.
  22. Each rail button reopens its section where you left it, and Browse, Table and People show on every book and subject page.
  23. Filters grey out choices that hold nothing instead of hiding them, and Books › People filters by authors or recommenders.
  24. Feedback takes a subject line and up to three screenshots.
  25. Biographies are grouped by the person they are about: 41 new pages, from Abraham Lincoln to Lee Kuan Yew.
  26. Sport splits into 23 sports, and Religion into one topic per faith.
  27. Book lists show as cards: the cover, one recommendation quote and every recommender by name.
  28. Seventeen subjects that had two or three pages under different names now have one page each.
  29. Every page lists its Experts as authors and recommenders, with a link to them on the Experts tab.
  30. Economics, Financial history, Financial panics and Accounting are subjects of their own, with one page per financial crisis.
  31. Book, person and subject pages open inside the app, so the tabs stay in view.
  32. 996 more book covers, and photographs or logos for 227 more people and companies.
  33. Books › Browse shows every subject as cards, and the rail holds Fund letters, Papers, Experts, Books and Funds.
  34. Every topic over 150 books splits into narrower topics, each with a page of its own.

Send feedback

What is it?
Screenshots, up to 3 (optional)
or paste one with Ctrl+V

We use your email only to reply to you.

Future Babble

Future Babble

Dan Gardner
2010
T3 305 pages · about 5h 5m to read Open Librarygoodreads

Summary

Gardner examines why expert predictions fail so consistently and why people continue to seek and believe them. His empirical foundation is Philip Tetlock's twenty-year study, which collected over eighty thousand forecasts from nearly three hundred experts and found their accuracy barely better than chance and worse than simple extrapolation rules.

Tetlock's most useful finding, which Gardner develops, is that a forecaster's field, experience and access to information predicted accuracy poorly, while their cognitive style predicted it well. Experts Tetlock classified as hedgehogs, meaning those who apply one organising framework to everything, performed worse than those classified as foxes, meaning those who use many partial frameworks, tolerate contradiction and adjust. Hedgehogs also attracted more media attention, because a single confident framework produces the definite statements broadcasting wants.

Gardner covers the psychology of why prediction fails: the illusion of control, hindsight bias which erases our memory of having been wrong, confirmation, and the human intolerance of uncertainty, which he argues is the demand side of the prediction industry. He documents specific failed forecasts across resource depletion, population, oil prices, geopolitics and economics, including the ones that made their authors famous.

His conclusion is that the correct response to an unpredictable future is not better forecasting but preparation that does not depend on any particular outcome. The book is journalism synthesising Tetlock's research rather than original work, and readers wanting the research itself should read Expert Political Judgment or Superforecasting.

Key takeaways 7

  1. Expert predictions about complex systems are barely more accurate than chance and worse than simple extrapolation rules.
  2. A forecaster's field, credentials and access to information predict accuracy poorly, while their cognitive style predicts it well.
  3. Forecasters who apply one organising framework to everything perform worse than those who use many partial frameworks and tolerate contradiction.
  4. Confident single-framework forecasters attract more media attention precisely because their errors come packaged as definite statements.
  5. Hindsight bias erases our memory of having been wrong, which is why the persistent failure of prediction does not reduce demand for it.
  6. Human intolerance of uncertainty is what sustains the prediction industry, since the demand is psychological rather than informational.
  7. The correct response to an unpredictable future is preparation that does not depend on any particular outcome rather than better forecasting.

Who should read it

Investors and executives who rely on forecasts and want the evidence on their accuracy and on which forecasters are worth reading.

About Dan Gardner

Canadian journalist who co-wrote Superforecasting with Philip Tetlock and How Big Things Get Done with Bent Flyvbjerg.

Superforecasting reports the Good Judgment Project tournament results and the habits that separated accurate forecasters: breaking questions into parts, updating in small increments, keeping score in numbers. How Big Things Get Done adds base-rate evidence from thousands of megaprojects on why budgets and schedules fail and what the successful ones did differently.

Who recommended it 1

Similar books 6

Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.

Philip E. Tetlock, Dan Gardner · 2015

The Good Judgment Project; the practices that measurably improve forecasts.

Bent Flyvbjerg, Dan Gardner · 2023

Why megaprojects overrun, and the reference-class forecasting correction.

Peter Bevelin · 2013

Bevelin distilling observation and inference habits from Sherlock Holmes

Peter Bevelin · 2016

Dialogue form; Munger's inversion habit worked through systematically.

Matthew Syed · 2015

Why aviation learns from every failure while fields like medicine hide theirs.

Recommended by: Richard Branson, Daniel Ek

Malcolm Gladwell · 2004

How snap judgments work, when to trust them and when they mislead.

Where it sits in the reference 2

Journalists
Investment philosophy

Topics

Decision MakingPsychology and BehaviourCognitive biases, judgement and decisions