Updates

  1. Person pages list letters, writing, profiles and links as sortable tables with filters, and show each person's companies as links; Fund letters show each letter's description in its own column.
  2. Experts show a checked job title and a short description of each person; 30 more people have photographs.
  3. Every company, fund, university and publication the experts work for has a page listing the people there.
  4. Fund letters show each letter's thesis and filter by it; 225 person pages list the essays, columns and newsletter issues the person wrote.
  5. Person pages list every essay and newsletter issue a person wrote, and their own books as a table in List view.
  6. Recommends shows the five largest kinds of book and the rest under More; browse pictures load sooner.
  7. Podcasts and talks link the original episode, filter by Audio and video or Press, and list each publisher once.
  8. Pages are wider, Recommends has List and Grid, and a filter clicked again turns off.
  9. Book cards sit in a ruled grid with Open Library and Goodreads links and each book's one-line note.
  10. Funds is now Investors; each investor's styles are buttons that filter the table.
  11. Podcasts and talks on a person's page filter by year and publisher and show as a list or a grid of pictures.
  12. Quotes show only people's own words: 472 summaries written by list sites are gone.
  13. Country pages open from Browse again, and every link on the shelf lands on a page.
  14. Subject and person pages show their sections as tabs, and each book appears once on a person's page.
  15. Book cards show the quote, who said it and the source; grids show five cards to a row.
  16. On a phone, a menu holds the sections, search, Updates, Feedback and dark mode.
  17. Feedback takes a screenshot of the page with no browser prompt, opens a screenshot full size when you click it, and clears itself once sent.
  18. Book cards are centred, search names the topic each book sits in, and any text cut short shows whole on hover.
  19. Search groups its results by kind: people, companies, geographies, subjects, topics, books, funds, fund letters and papers.
  20. The Books table lists who recommended each book by name, and the browser tab names the section you are in.
  21. Feedback can take a screenshot of the page, or one you paste or choose, and opens in the corner beside Updates.
  22. Each rail button reopens its section where you left it, and Browse, Table and People show on every book and subject page.
  23. Filters grey out choices that hold nothing instead of hiding them, and Books › People filters by authors or recommenders.
  24. Feedback takes a subject line and up to three screenshots.
  25. Biographies are grouped by the person they are about: 41 new pages, from Abraham Lincoln to Lee Kuan Yew.
  26. Sport splits into 23 sports, and Religion into one topic per faith.
  27. Book lists show as cards: the cover, one recommendation quote and every recommender by name.
  28. Seventeen subjects that had two or three pages under different names now have one page each.
  29. Every page lists its Experts as authors and recommenders, with a link to them on the Experts tab.
  30. Economics, Financial history, Financial panics and Accounting are subjects of their own, with one page per financial crisis.
  31. Book, person and subject pages open inside the app, so the tabs stay in view.
  32. 996 more book covers, and photographs or logos for 227 more people and companies.
  33. Books › Browse shows every subject as cards, and the rail holds Fund letters, Papers, Experts, Books and Funds.
  34. Every topic over 150 books splits into narrower topics, each with a page of its own.

Send feedback

What is it?
Screenshots, up to 3 (optional)
or paste one with Ctrl+V

We use your email only to reply to you.

The Beginning of Infinity

The Beginning of Infinity

David Deutsch
2011
T2 487 pages · about 8h 7m to read Open Librarygoodreads

Summary

Deutsch, a physicist who did foundational work in quantum computation, argues that knowledge growth is unbounded and that the mechanism is the creation of explanations that are hard to vary. His central criterion is that a good explanation accounts for what it purports to account for while having every component doing necessary work, so that any change to it destroys its explanatory power. Bad explanations can be adjusted to accommodate any evidence.

He argues against empiricism as the source of scientific knowledge, holding that observation cannot generate theories and that conjecture followed by criticism does, which follows Popper. He argues against inductivism directly, and against the claim that scientific theories are merely instruments for prediction.

His larger claim is that anything not forbidden by the laws of physics is achievable given the right knowledge, which he calls the principle of optimism, and that all problems are soluble, though solving one produces new ones. He applies the framework to the multiverse interpretation of quantum mechanics, to the evolution of culture, to the difference between static and dynamic societies, to artificial general intelligence, to aesthetics and to political decision-making, where he argues that the right criterion for institutions is the ease of removing bad policies rather than the quality of the selection process.

The book is demanding and the chapters vary considerably in quality. The physics sections assume comfort with unfamiliar arguments. Critics find the optimism unfalsifiable and the extensions into aesthetics and politics weaker than the epistemology. The hard-to-vary criterion is the most usable idea and applies directly to evaluating business theses and strategic explanations.

Key takeaways 8

  1. Good explanations are hard to vary, meaning every component does necessary work and any change destroys the explanation's power.
  2. Knowledge grows through conjecture and criticism rather than through the accumulation of observations, since observation cannot generate a theory.
  3. Anything not forbidden by the laws of physics is achievable given the relevant knowledge, which makes knowledge rather than resources the binding constraint.
  4. All problems are soluble, and solving them creates new problems, so the absence of problems would indicate stagnation rather than success.
  5. Static societies persist by suppressing the creation of new ideas, and dynamic societies are historically rare and recent.
  6. Institutions should be judged by how easily bad policies and bad leaders can be removed, rather than by how well they select good ones.
  7. Explanations that can be adjusted to fit any evidence explain nothing, which is the test that distinguishes science from its imitations.
  8. Progress has no known limit, and claims that a field or a civilisation has reached its ceiling are claims about current knowledge rather than about reality.

Who should read it

Readers who want a rigorous criterion for what makes an explanation good, applicable to evaluating investment theses and strategic reasoning.

Who recommended it 8 · 2 direct

Sam Altmanreported

Similar books 6

Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.

David Deutsch · 1997

Reality through four strands: many-worlds physics, computation, evolution, Popper.

John Brockman · 2012

Short essays on the scientific concepts most worth adopting

Edward O. Wilson · 1998

How the sciences and humanities can be unified by causal links from physics up.

“I was inspired by E. O. Wilson's book Consilience, which came out in 1998 and is a book I'd recommend.” — Michael Mauboussin

Source: MOI Global interview with Michael Mauboussin

Recommended by: Michael Mauboussin, Mohnish Pabrai

Thomas S. Kuhn · 1962

Science moves through long stretches of normal work broken by paradigm shifts.

Yuval Noah Harari · 2011

How shared fictions such as money, nations and gods let humans cooperate at scale.

“…books I've recommended, highlighted to death, or forced on friends.” — Andrew Wilkinson

Source: Andrew Wilkinson's Bookshelf, neverenough.com

Recommended by: Andrew Wilkinson, Bill Gates, Mohnish Pabrai and 38 others

Daniel C. Dennett · 2013

Thought experiments and other tools a philosopher uses to reason carefully.

Where it sits in the reference 1

Mental models

Topics

SciencePhilosophyPhilosophy of science and mindHistory and philosophy of science