The Sovereign Individual

Davidson and Rees-Mogg argue that information technology will dissolve the nation state's ability to tax, because the most productive people and their capital will become mobile and encryptable while governments remain territorial. They predict the emergence of a class they call sovereign individuals, who select jurisdictions the way consumers select services, and a corresponding decline in mass democracy and in the welfare state.

The historical framework runs through what they call megapolitical transitions, arguing that the dominant costs and returns of violence determine the political structure of an age. They cover the shift from hunter-gatherer bands to agriculture, from feudalism to the nation state driven by gunpowder and by the printing press, and then to what they call the information age. Their reading of the medieval church as a business, and of the Reformation as a competitive disruption of that business, is the clearest application of the framework.

The predictions are specific and some have proved accurate. They forecast digital cash outside government control, jurisdictional competition for wealthy residents, the erosion of the middle class in developed economies, increasing political anger from those who cannot move, and the growth of private security. The cryptocurrency community treats the book as foundational for this reason.

Other predictions failed. Governments have proved considerably better at taxing and surveilling digital activity than the authors expected, and the FATCA regime, common reporting standards and global minimum tax agreements run the opposite way. The tone toward those left behind is contemptuous, and the authors' political preferences shape the analysis throughout. Read it as an argument about jurisdictional competition, checked against the last decade of tax enforcement.