
How behavioural economics won the argument, told by the man who ran it.
Thaler writes the intellectual history of behavioural economics as a personal account of building the field against sustained resistance from economists who held that departures from rational behaviour would cancel out in aggregate.
The substantive economics covers the endowment effect, which he demonstrated with mugs in classroom experiments showing that ownership raises valuation immediately; mental accounting, which describes how people treat money as non-fungible depending on which mental category it occupies; transaction utility, meaning the pleasure or displeasure derived from the deal itself independent of the item; the failure of the sunk cost principle in actual behaviour; self-control problems and the planner and doer model; fairness constraints on market behaviour, demonstrated by experiments showing that consumers punish price increases they consider unfair even when the market clears; and behavioural finance including the Value Line anomaly and the excess volatility findings with Shiller.
He describes the practical applications including the Save More Tomorrow programme, which used automatic escalation of contribution rates to raise savings, and the nudge unit work in the United Kingdom. The narrative of resistance is instructive. Thaler documents the specific objections economists raised, including that incentives would eliminate the errors, that markets would arbitrage them away, and that learning would correct them, and he records how each was addressed.
The book overlaps heavily with Nudge and with Kahneman's work. Some behavioural findings have replicated poorly and Thaler's field has faced the same scrutiny as the rest of psychology. The account of how an academic field is built against an entrenched position is the part with the widest application.
Investors and operators who want the history and the economics of behavioural findings from the person who built the field.
Charles R. Walgreen Distinguished Service Professor of Behavioral Science and Economics, University of Chicago Booth School of Business; co-founder, Fuller & Thaler Asset Management; Nobel laureate in economics 2017
The Anomalies series and Nudge are the primary sources for behavioral economics as an applied discipline in finance and public policy.
University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Fuller & Thaler Asset Management
“He opens his new book, Misbehaving, with Vilfredo Pareto's assertion”
Chosen by shared topics, the entries that hold them, and the people who recommended both.
Nudge: The Final Edition published 2021.
Recommended by: Tristan Harris
Kahneman's synthesis of behavioral economics is the cognitive science underpinning every negotiation tactic. Anchoring, loss aversion, framing effects, and the planning fallacy — understanding why these biases operate, not just that they exist, makes you harder to exploit and more honest about your own irrationality.
“…books I've recommended, highlighted to death, or forced on friends.” — Andrew Wilkinson
Source: Andrew Wilkinson's Bookshelf, neverenough.com
Recommended by: Andrew Wilkinson, Charles de Vaulx and 32 others
Why people mistake luck for skill, above all in markets.
“Fooled by Randomness is a serious, intellectually sophisticated book, well worth reading carefully. At times, the book is condescending. Nevertheless, there are some great insights.” — Barton Biggs
Source: Biggs on a sophisticated book worth reading carefully
Recommended by: Barton Biggs, Michael Mauboussin and 11 others
Experiments showing that people depart from rational choice in repeatable ways.
Recommended by: Mohnish Pabrai, Alfred Lin, Anna Cheng and 6 others
Tavris and Aronson focus on what happens after a bias fires: the self-justification, narrative revision, and escalating commitment that follow. Cognitive dissonance, they argue, is not a personality flaw but a universal mechanism, and understanding it explains police misconduct, political tribalism, and therapy failures in a single framework.
Recommended by: Mohnish Pabrai, Nat Eliason and 2 others
Experiments showing most cheating is many people cheating a little.
Recommended by: Mohnish Pabrai
Topics